✔ work through proposal comments and respond
Completed by Robyn
- Assigned to
-
Ian P.
Robyn
- Due on
- Notes
-
Hi Robyn,Phil and I reviewed the proposal and several comments/edits, bottom line we are thinking of a 9-month contract that could get extended to June 2025 if things are moving slower in the 23K range. See specific comments by page of the proposal:Page 3:Under design, remove solutions brochureAdd in reworking existing brochuresMove GEMS leaning into the Design bucket, total of 44 hoursPage 4:Focus of web is to restructure webpages to be more product and user focused, rather than the current general descriptive contentRemove time for Funding / Partnership sections and Communities of practiceCan you clarify what "download case studies is", we were not sure, and thinking of removing this item as we have no urgent need to edit case studiesCan you clarify what additional blog functionality is regarding.Given our current and near future client size, we will not renew Fresh or pursue Salesforce CRM. In these areas, we would be mostly looking for guidance, examples and some testing.Combine the workflows and knowledge base into one bucket, totaling no more than $6,200Pages 5, 6, 7 and 8No comments/editsPage 9:Change time frame from 6 to 9 months (July 2024 - March 2025)Add note that Matogen staff have different bill rates, and that is reflected in the estimate. There is not a fixed hourly rate that GEMS would be billed for all work (I'm worried about accounting doing line by line calc's and getting different numbers when the same number of hours are estimated)If you could add in the additional info for the clarifying questions via email and then send an updated proposal next week, we will have a final review, and if no other questions I will put request for this contract through UMN finance.Best,Kris
Would you update the proposal accordingly and add info on the following: